22/08/2016

European Parliament - Kostas Chrysogonos’s Question & Answer: Alarming figures on obesity



17 June 2016 - Kostas Chrysogonos – [E-004932-16] - Subject: Alarming figures on obesity:

The OECD's 2015 report Health at a Glance contains alarming figures about the percentage of citizens and especially children who are facing obesity. According to this report, obesity is one of the greatest health challenges of the 21st century, since, especially in Europe, it is three times as common as in the 1980s, and by 2030 it is expected to affect up to one in two Europeans[1]. Obesity is also considered responsible for the spread of diseases such as diabetes, hypertension etc. Of even greater concern, however, is the fact that these figures are more pronounced among children, since in Greece already about one in two boys between 10 to 12 years of age is overweight, followed by the UK which has a figure of 35%[2].

In view of the above, will the Commission say:

1. Does it monitor World Health Organisation surveys on obesity?

2. What steps will it take to curb the growth of this phenomenon?

3. The OECD report proposes an increase in the price of types of food that are considered sources of fat and sugar. Does it agree with this strategy?


Answer given by Mr Andriukaitis on behalf of the Commission (10 August 2016):

« 1. The Commission, under the framework of the Health Programme[3], both follows and supports the World Health Organisation (WHO) obesity-related databases Nutrition, Obesity and Physical Activity and Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative[4]. The Commission, the Member States and the WHO are also collaborating to monitor the action plan on Childhood Obesity (APCO).

2. The Commission supports Member States' action to promote healthy diets in the framework of the comprehensive Strategy on Nutrition, Overweight, and Obesity-related health issues[5], the Health Programme[6] and through the High Level Group on Nutrition and Physical Activity[7] and the EU platform for action on diet, physical activity and health[8].
Initiatives are ongoing, such as the implementation of the APCO, the Joint Action on Nutrition and Physical Activity[9] and the EU Framework for national action on selected nutrients[10].

In addition, by promoting responsible marketing to children[11], improving consumer information[12], and supporting the EU School Fruit, Vegetables and Milk Scheme[13], the Commission promotes healthier diets. Horizon 2020 offers opportunities for related research[14][15][16] and innovation is also supported through related pilot projects financed by the European Parliament[17].

3. Food prices can be influenced by taxation and/or subsidies and such measures are — within the limits of the Treaty — the responsibility of Member States. Evidence and the analysis of the WHO and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development show that such measures can be an effective and efficient tool to promote healthier consumption habits. Nevertheless, taxation should be considered as part of a wider range of tools and the complexity of its effects calls for careful consideration and design.».



European Parliament - Mara Bizzotto’s Question & Answer: Creation of a European catalogue of food and agricultural products from the mountains



22 June 2016 - Mara Bizzotto – [E-005057-16] - Subject: Creation of a European catalogue of food and agricultural products from the mountains:

The system of designations of origin and geographical indications represents a vast economic and cultural heritage for the safeguarding and development of Member States' typical products.

In this context, products from the mountains are a further demonstration of quality and of the strong link between Italian and European excellence in agriculture and in food and their place of origin. In 2014, the Commission approved the optional quality term ‘mountain product’ (Delegated Regulation No 665/2014) obtained in mountain areas as defined by Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, in a bid to enable mountain producers to boost and protect the identity of their products, which — despite their added value — are not protected by any specific quality term.

The increase in food counterfeiting damages the market in products with a designation of origin and misleads consumers, who are in fact calling for greater transparency in the sector of typical products, and the specific nature of food and agricultural production in mountain areas requires greater input by producers as a result of the particular natural environment in which they operate. In view of those facts, will the Commission create a European catalogue of mountain products to protect and promote excellent products in the mountain areas of Italy and the EU as a whole?

Answer given by Mr Hogan on behalf of the Commission (17 August 2016):

«Optional quality term ‘mountain product’ was established by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs[1]. Its aim is to provide mountain producers with an effective tool to better market their product and to reduce the actual risks of consumer confusion as to the mountain provenance of products in the market place. According to Article 34 of this regulation, Member States must undertake checks, based on a risk analysis, to ensure compliance with the related requirements. In this way Member States are enforcing the respect of the rules and fighting counterfeiting practices.

Unlike geographical indications, the system of optional quality terms does not provide for a registration procedure at EU level. Hence, the Commission does not have a list of products using the term ‘mountain product’. Member States are not required to inform the Commission about the use of the term ‘mountain product’ on their territory either. Taking into account that the responsibility for implementation is conferred to the Member States, it is not envisaged that the Commission would create a European catalogue of products using the term ‘mountain product’.

Labelling of agricultural and food products of mountain farming in Europe was presented in a study[2] from the year 2013 commissioned by the Commission.».
.



European Parliament - Mara Bizzotto’s Question & Answer: Creation of a European catalogue of food and agricultural products from the mountains



22 June 2016 - Mara Bizzotto – [E-005057-16] - Subject: Creation of a European catalogue of food and agricultural products from the mountains:

The system of designations of origin and geographical indications represents a vast economic and cultural heritage for the safeguarding and development of Member States' typical products.

In this context, products from the mountains are a further demonstration of quality and of the strong link between Italian and European excellence in agriculture and in food and their place of origin. In 2014, the Commission approved the optional quality term ‘mountain product’ (Delegated Regulation No 665/2014) obtained in mountain areas as defined by Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, in a bid to enable mountain producers to boost and protect the identity of their products, which — despite their added value — are not protected by any specific quality term.

The increase in food counterfeiting damages the market in products with a designation of origin and misleads consumers, who are in fact calling for greater transparency in the sector of typical products, and the specific nature of food and agricultural production in mountain areas requires greater input by producers as a result of the particular natural environment in which they operate. In view of those facts, will the Commission create a European catalogue of mountain products to protect and promote excellent products in the mountain areas of Italy and the EU as a whole?

Answer given by Mr Hogan on behalf of the Commission (17 August 2016):

«Optional quality term ‘mountain product’ was established by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs[1]. Its aim is to provide mountain producers with an effective tool to better market their product and to reduce the actual risks of consumer confusion as to the mountain provenance of products in the market place. According to Article 34 of this regulation, Member States must undertake checks, based on a risk analysis, to ensure compliance with the related requirements. In this way Member States are enforcing the respect of the rules and fighting counterfeiting practices.

Unlike geographical indications, the system of optional quality terms does not provide for a registration procedure at EU level. Hence, the Commission does not have a list of products using the term ‘mountain product’. Member States are not required to inform the Commission about the use of the term ‘mountain product’ on their territory either. Taking into account that the responsibility for implementation is conferred to the Member States, it is not envisaged that the Commission would create a European catalogue of products using the term ‘mountain product’.

Labelling of agricultural and food products of mountain farming in Europe was presented in a study[2] from the year 2013 commissioned by the Commission.».
.



16/08/2016

European Parliament - Norbert Erdős’s Questions & Answer: Scientific grounds for restricting the use of xylitol as a sweetener



6 July 2016 - Norbert Erdős – [E-005525-16] - Subject: Scientific grounds for restricting the use of xylitol as a sweetener:

With reference to the Commission's answer to my Question E-003959/2016 [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=WQ&reference=E-2016-003959&language=EN], I would like to put the following questions to the Commission:

1. What is the scientific reason, particularly in relation to human health, why the European Union strictly restricts the use of xylitol as a sweetener?

2. To whom within the Commission (name, address, telephone number, e-mail address) may a business operating within the EU turn for information if it wishes to use xylitol as a sweetener in the manufacture of food?

Answer given by Mr Andriukaitis on behalf of the Commission (12 August 2016):

«The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its response to written question E-003959/2016[1] on the subject of the use of xylitol as both an additive and a sweetener.

In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives[2] a food additive may be used as a sweetener only if, in addition to serving one or more of the purposes set out in Article 6(2), it serves one or more of the purposes set out in Article 7 "Specific conditions for sweeteners".

Xylitol is permitted as a sweetener in a variety of foods not including beverages. No upper limit is specified.

Xylitol was evaluated by the Scientific Committee for Food[3] which considered its use acceptable provided limitations due to its laxative action were kept in mind. Excessive ingestion of polyol-based sweeteners may cause such undesirable effects; therefore ingestion of high amounts of this compound should be taken into account when considering its appropriate levels of use, alone or in combination with other polyols.

All information on food additives, including the common authorisation procedure in the EU and the practical guidance for applicants is available online[4], including the contact details of the service and person to contact for further information.».



[1] http://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/parliamentary-questions.html
[2] Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food additives
[3]     Reports from the Scientific Committee for Food (16th series). Opinion expressed 1984. Food science and techniques, 1985.
[4]     http://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/food_improvement_agents/additives/index_en.htm

European Parliament - Mireille D'Ornano’s Questions & Answer: Food products from cloned animals



7 July 2016 - Mireille D'Ornano – [E-005570-16] - Subject: Food products from cloned animals:

In December 2013, the Commission put forward a proposal to ban animal cloning in the EU. In September 2015, Parliament broadened the scope of this proposal by recommending a ban on the sale of meat or milk from descendants of cloned animals and calling for traceability to be mandatory.

In November 2015, an expert report conceded that such products may have ended up on EU consumers' plates, as a result of meat, milk and genetic material — the latter used for animal breeding purposes in the EU — being imported from the US, China, Argentina, Brazil, Canada and Australia.

In its 2008 report and 2009 and 2010 statements, the European Food Safety Authority outlined the health and welfare implications for cloned animals: high levels of mortality in gestation, difficult births and severe birth defects.

1. Does the Commission take the view that people in the EU have the right to know whether they are eating food products from cloned animals?

2. Will it acknowledge that cloning is detrimental to animal health and welfare?

Answer given by Mr Andriukaitis on behalf of the Commission (12 August 2016):

«1. Food from animal clones is considered a novel food in the EU.  Until such time as specific legislation on food from animal clones[1] enters into force, food from animal clones falls under the scope of Regulation (EC) No 258/97 on novel foods. It therefore requires a pre-market approval including a safety evaluation and, if approved, it should be appropriately labelled for final consumption in accordance with the Union legislation in force.

2. The Commission, in its proposal for a Directive on the cloning of animals[2], did indeed take into account the findings included in the EFSA opinions mentioned by the Honourable Member to provisionally prohibit in the EU the cloning of animals and the imports of animal clones.».




[1] Proposal for a Council Directive on the placing on the market of food from clones (COM(2013)0893 final).
[2] Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the cloning of animals of the bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine and equine species kept and reproduced for farming purposes (COM(2013) 0892 final)

15/08/2016

European Parliament - Martin Häusling’s Questions & Answer: EU position on synthetic biology in the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity



12 July 2016 - Martin Häusling – [P-005677-16] - Subject: EU position on synthetic biology in the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity:

Synthetic biology is the next generation of genetic engineering techniques and represents an extreme version of earlier genetic engineering techniques used to produce GMO plants, animals, micro-organisms and foodstuffs. Among other things, synthetic biology allows for the production of entirely novel organisms, and of novel traits that cannot be produced using conventional breeding techniques.

None of the EU institutions have, to our knowledge, an official position on synthetic biology, or even an official definition of the term. This despite the fact formal discussions on the issue of synthetic biology were initiated in 2015 in the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity (the Cartagena and Nagoya protocols). The Commission and the EU Presidency are taking part in these discussions, which aim to provide a definition of synthetic biology, and to elaborate guidelines for risk assessments of the different techniques the term applies to.

In the light of the above, the Commission is asked to answer the following:

1. What is its negotiating mandate in these discussions, and on what basis — official positions, texts or reports — is it relying on for this task?

2. Has the European Food Safety Authority been given any mandate in this regard?

3. How does it plan to inform Parliament and civil society about this issue, and involve them in the debates regarding it, and how does it intend to use their participation to formulate an EU position?

Answer given by Mr Vella on behalf of the Commission (12 August 2016):

«1. The EU position for the negotiations at the thirteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP13) will be determined on the basis of the Council conclusions to be adopted under the Slovak Presidency in October 2016.

2. The European Food Safety Authority has not been given a mandate to work on Synthetic biology. However, the Commission mandated its Scientific Committees[1] which have issued three opinions on Synthetic biology:

• Final Opinion on Synthetic Biology I: Definition[2],

• Final Opinion on Synthetic Biology II: Risk assessment methodologies and safety aspects[3],
• Final Opinion on Synthetic Biology III: Risks to the environment and biodiversity related to synthetic biology and research priorities in the field of synthetic biology[4].

3. The Commission welcomes views from Members of the European Parliament and stakeholders and will regularly inform them through ad-hoc meetings during the CBD COP13.».






[1] The Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks, the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks and the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety.
[2] http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consultations/public_consultations/scenihr_consultation_21_en.htm
[3] http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consultations/public_consultations/scenihr_consultation_26_en.htm
[4] http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consultations/public_consultations/scenihr_consultation_28_en.htm 

26/07/2016

Barcelona: septiembre de 2016 - Máster oficial de Seguridad Alimentaria




El máster oficial de Seguridad Alimentaria es un máster interuniversitario, coordinado por la Universidad de Barcelona, en el que también participan la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona y la Universidad Pompeu Fabra. En su organización e impartición colaboran de forma destacada la Agencia Catalana de Seguridad Alimentaria de la Agencia de Salud Pública de Cataluña y el Departamento de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación de la Generalitat de Cataluña. La seguridad de los alimentos es una exigencia legal y los problemas que se pueden derivar de la falta de esta pueden tener un impacto muy importante sobre la población. Por ello, el máster responde al interés creciente en la seguridad alimentaria de la sociedad actual y de todos los agentes implicados: consumidores, empresas agroalimentarias y administraciones públicas.


Es un máster de especialización en el ámbito agroalimentario, un sector socioeconómico de amplio espectro que se extiende desde la granja hasta la mesa y se concreta en la preocupación social de los consumidores, individualmente o en asociaciones, para la nutrición humana y la industria alimentaria. En todos los niveles de la cadena alimentaria está presente el interés de la sociedad por la calidad y la seguridad de los alimentos que se le ofrecen. El carácter transversal de la seguridad alimentaria hace que el máster sea complementario a una formación general de cualquier grado relacionado con la alimentación u otras especialidades.

El objetivo del máster es que los estudiantes se especialicen en el ámbito de la seguridad alimentaria. Esta formación puede servir tanto para iniciarse en la investigación científica (estudios de doctorado) como para contribuir a la gestión de la seguridad alimentaria, ya sea en el ámbito de la empresa privada agroalimentaria o en el de la Administración pública, siempre en el marco de un equipo multidisciplinario.