Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Fraude alimentario. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Fraude alimentario. Afficher tous les articles

10/11/2021

🛑 October 2021 - Monthly Summary of Articles on Food Fraud and Adulteration






Monthly summary of articles on food fraud and adulteration – October, 2021. Food fraud cases: wine, alcoholic beverages, milk and milk products, herbs and spices, cereals, vegetables, meat products, food supplements, seafood, sugar, olive oil, honey.

 

11/01/2021

How food fraud plagued the industry in 2020

 





It is fair to say that 2020 was a challenging year with wide-ranging effects, including significant effects on our ongoing efforts to ensure food integrity and prevent fraud in the food system. COVID-19 caused major supply chain disruptions for foods and many other consumer products. It also highlighted challenges in effective tracking and standardization of food fraud-related data.

Let’s take a look at some of the notable food fraud occurrences in 2020:

  • Organic Products. The Spanish Guardia Civil investigated an organized crime group that sold pistachios with pesticide residues that were fraudulently labeled as organic, reportedly yielding €6 million in profit. USDA reported fraudulent organic certificates for products including winter squash, leafy greens, collagen peptides powder, blackberries, and avocados. Counterfeit wines with fraudulent DOG, PGI, and organic labels were discovered in Italy.
  • Herbs and Spices. Quite a few reports came out of India and Pakistan about adulteration and fraud in the local spice market. One of the most egregious involved the use of animal dung along with various other substances in the production of fraudulent chili powder, coriander powder, turmeric powder, and garam masala spice mix. Greece issued a notification for a turmeric recall following the detection of lead, chromium, and mercury in a sample of the product. Belgium recalled chili pepper for containing an “unauthorized coloring agent.” Reports of research conducted at Queen’s University Belfast also indicated that 25% of sage samples purchased from e-commerce or independent channels in the U.K. were adulterated with other leafy material.
  • Dairy Products. India and Pakistan have also reported quite a few incidents of fraud in local markets involving dairy products. These have included reports of counterfeit ghee and fraudulent ghee manufactured with animal fats as well as milk adulterated with a variety of fraudulent substances. The Czech Republic issued a report about Edam cheese that contained vegetable fat instead of milk fat.
  • Honey. Greece issued multiple alerts for honey containing sugar syrups and, in one case, caramel colors. Turkey reported a surveillance test that identified foreign sugars in honeycomb.
  • Meat and Fish. This European report concluded that the vulnerability to fraud in animal production networks was particularly high during to the COVID-19 pandemic due to the “most widely spread effects in terms of production, logistics, and demand.” Thousands of pounds of seafood were destroyed in Cambodia because they contained a gelatin-like substance. Fraudulent USDA marks of inspection were discovered on chicken imported to the United States from China. Soy protein far exceeding levels that could be expected from cross contamination were identified in sausage in the Czech Republic. In Colombia, a supplier of food for school children was accused of selling donkey and horse meat as beef. Decades of fraud involving halal beef was recently reported in in Malaysia.
  • Alcoholic Beverages. To date, our system has captured more than 30 separate incidents of fraud involving wine or other alcoholic beverages in 2020. Many of these involved illegally produced products, some of which contained toxic substances such as methanol. There were also multiple reports of counterfeit wines and whisky. Wines were also adulterated with sugarflavorscolors and water.

We have currently captured about 70% of the number of incidents for 2020 as compared to 2019, although there are always lags in reporting and data capture, so we expect that number to rise over the coming weeks. These numbers do not appear to bear out predictions about the higher risk of food fraud cited by many groups resulting from the effects of COVID-19. This is likely due in part to reduced surveillance and reporting due to the effects of COVID lockdowns on regulatory and auditing programs. However, as noted in a recent article, we should take seriously food fraud reports that occur against this “backdrop of reduced regulatory oversight during the COVID-19 pandemic.” If public reports are just the tip of the iceburg, 2020 numbers that are close to those reported in 2019 may indeed indicate that the iceburg is actually larger.

Unfortunately, tracking food fraud reports and inferring trends is a difficult task. There is currently no globally standardized system for collection and reporting information on food fraud occurrences, or even standardized definitions for food fraud and the ways in which it happens. Media reports of fraud are challenging to verify and there can be many media reports related to one individual incident, which complicates tracking (especially by automated systems). Reports from official sources are not without their own challenges. Government agencies have varying priorities for their surveillance and testing programs, and these priorities have a direct effect on the data that is reported. Therefore, increases in reports for a particular commodity do not necessarily indicate a trend, they may just reflect an ongoing regulatory priority a particular country. Official sources are also not standardized with respect to how they report food safety or fraud incidents. Two RASFF notifications in 2008 following the discovery of melamine adulteration in milk illustrate this point (see Figure 1). In the first notification for a “milk drink” product, the hazard category was listed as “adulteration/fraud.” However, in the second notification for “chocolate and strawberry flavor body pen sets,” the hazard category was listed as “industrial contaminants,” even though the analytical result was higher.1

RASFF

RASFF, melamine detection
Figure 1. RASFF notifications for the detection of melamine in two products.1

What does all of this mean for ensuring food authenticity into 2021? We need to continue efforts to align terminology, track food fraud risk data, and ensure transparency and evaluation of the data that is reported. Alignment and standardization of food fraud reporting would go a long way to improving our understanding of how much food fraud occurs and where. Renewed efforts by global authorities to strengthen food authenticity protections are important. Finally, consumers and industry must continue to demand and ensure authenticity in our food supply. While most food fraud may not have immediate health consequences for consumers, reduced controls can lead to systemic problems and have devastating effects.

Reference

  1. Everstine, K., Popping, B., and Gendel, S.M. (2021). Food fraud mitigation: strategic approaches and tools. In R.S. Hellberg, K. Everstine, & S. Sklare (Eds.) Food Fraud – A Global Threat With Public Health and Economic Consequences (pp. 23-44). Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817242-1.00015-4

29/09/2020

🛑 USA - Seafood company implicated in false labeling scam

 


Report on Supply Chain Compliance 3, no. 18 (September 17, 2020)

1 United States Department of Justice, “Seafood Processor Pleads Guilty to Selling Foreign Crabmeat Falsely Labeled as Blue Crab from USA,” news release, September 3, 2020, https://bit.ly/3hhBJ4a.

[View source.]



07/04/2020

Derecho alimentario - Online Paper Repository (Food Law)


Acrylamide

Lubna Rifai and Fatima A. Saleh, “A Review on Acrylamide in Food: Occurrence, Toxicity, and Mitigation Strategies”. International Journal of Toxicology (2020) doi.org/10.1177/1091581820902405 [published online before print: 4 February 2020[1]].

Abstract
Acrylamide (AA) is a food contaminant present in a wide range of frequently consumed foods, which makes human exposure to this toxicant unfortunately unavoidable. However, efforts to reduce the formation of AA in food have resulted in some success. This review aims to summarize the occurrence of AA and the potential mitigation strategies of its formation in foods. Formation of AA in foods is mainly linked to Maillard reaction, which is the first feasible route that can be manipulated to reduce AA formation. Furthermore, manipulating processing conditions such as time and temperature of the heating process, and including certain preheating treatments such as soaking and blanching, can further reduce AA formation. Due to the high exposure to AA, recognition of its toxic effect is necessary, especially in developing countries where awareness about AA health risks is still very low. Therefore, this review also focuses on the different toxic effects of AA exposure, including neurotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and immunotoxicity.



Animal welfare

M. Meylan et al., “Effects of the novel concept ‘outdoor veal calf’ on antimicrobial use, mortality and weight gain in Switzerland”. Preventive Veterinary Medicine (2020) doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104907 [published online before print: 1 February 2020[2]].

Abstract
The aim of the intervention study ‘outdoor veal calf’ was to evaluate a novel concept for calf fattening which aimed at reducing antimicrobial use without compromising animal health. Management practices such as commingling of calves from multiple birth farms, crowding, and suboptimal barn climate are responsible for high antimicrobial use and mortality in the veal calf population. The risk of selecting bacteria resistant to antimicrobials and of economic losses is accordingly elevated. The ‘outdoor veal calf’ concept, implemented in nineteen intervention farms (IF), is based on three main measures: 1. purchased calves are transported directly from neighboring birth farms to the fattening facility instead of commingling calves in livestock dealer trucks; 2. each calf is vaccinated against pneumonia after arrival and completes a three-week quarantine in an individual hutch; and 3. the calves spend the rest of the fattening period in outdoor hutches in groups not exceeding 10 calves. The covered and bedded paddock and the group hutches provide shelter from cold weather and direct sunshine, constant access to fresh air is warranted. Nineteen conventional calf fattening operations of similar size served as controls (CF). Every farm was visited once a month for a one-year period, and data regarding animal health, treatments, and production parameters were collected. Treatment intensity was assessed by use of the defined daily dose method (TIDDD in days per animal year), and calf mortality and daily weight gain were recorded in both farm groups.
Mean TIDDD was 5.3-fold lower in IF compared to CF (5.9 ± 6.5 vs. 31.5 ± 27.4 days per animal year; p < 0.001). Mortality was 2.1-fold lower in IF than in CF (3.1% ± 2.3 vs. 6.3 % ± 4.9; p = 0.020). Average daily gain did not differ between groups (1.29 ± 0.17 kg/day in IF vs. 1.35 ± 0.16 kg/day in CF; p = 0.244). A drastic reduction in antimicrobial use and mortality was achieved in the novel ‘outdoor veal calf’ system without compromising animal health. The principles of risk reduction used in designing the system can be used to improve management and animal health, decrease the need for antimicrobial treatments and thus selection pressure on bacteria in veal operations.



Entomophagy

Jinsoo Hwang and Ja Young Choe, “How to enhance the image of edible insect restaurants: Focusing on perceived risk theory”. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 87 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102464.

Abstract
Although edible insects are getting attention all over the world, consumers are still reluctant to visit edible insect restaurants. Thus, the objective of this research is to explore what risks customers perceive in edible insect restaurants and how those risks affect the image of edible insect restaurants. More specifically, First, the results of principal components analysis showed that 21 perceived risk items were divided into seven factors: quality, psychological, health, financial, environmental, time-loss, and social risks. Second, five sub-dimensions of perceived risk had a negative effect on image, with the exception of financial and environmental risks. Lastly, image was found to increase intention to use, word-of-mouth intention, and willingness to pay more.



Food choices

J. M. Dieterle, “Shifting the Focus: Food Choice, Paternalism, and State Regulation”. Food ethics, Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020) doi.org/10.1007/s41055-019-00059-z [published online before print: 21 December 2019[3]].

Abstract
In this paper, I examine the question of whether there is justification for regulations that place limits on food choices. I begin by discussing Sarah Conly’s recent defense of paternalist limits on food choice. I argue that Conly’s argument is flawed because it assumes a particular conception of health that is not universally shared. I examine this conception of health in some detail, and I argue that we need to shift our focus from individual behaviors and lifestyle to the broader social and environmental context. Such a shift allows us to see the ways in which industry practices are negatively impacting our well-being (a broader concept than “health”). I argue that state regulatory activity surrounding the conditions under which food is grown, processed, marketed, and sold needs to be strengthened. As a result, there are likely to be some indirect limitations on food choice. These indirect limitations are justified, but regulations in which the goal is to change individual behavior or lifestyle are not.



Food Fraud

Joe Whitworth, “Germany - Ex-Bayern-Ei managing director given suspended sentence", IFT (2020) [Blog Source_foodsafetynews/com.2020_03 - available on the Internet at <https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2020/03/ex-bayern-ei-managing-director-given-suspended-sentence/> (last accessed on 22 March 2020)].



Nathaliede Marcellis-Warinac et al., “Food industry perceptions and actions towards food fraud: Insights from a pan-Canadian study”. Food Control (2020) doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107182 [published online before print: 27 February 2020[4]].

Abstract
Food fraud is becoming a major concern for the food industry, consumers and governments. Food industries are accountable for food fraud management and, since January 2018, must implement measures to counter food fraud as part of a Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) scheme. However, information related to Food Business Operators' (FBO) perceptions and knowledge on food fraud is still very scarce. Hence, from October 2017 to April 2018, FBOs from different sectors across Canada were invited to answer an online survey of 52 closed-ended questions about their perceptions of food fraud and food fraud management. Close to 400 Canadian FBOs filled out the survey. This paper aims to present their perceptions, concerns and needs relative to food fraud, and their practices to manage and prevent this risk. Answers were collected and analyzed to build a representative picture of the Canadian food industry's perceived readiness and awareness of food fraud. A Kruskal—Wallis test was used to analyze differences among producers, processors and distributors regarding perceptions and knowledge of food fraud. This study provides valuable insights allowing academics and regulators to adapt their communication and collaboration with food industry stakeholders. It could also be used by FBOs as a first base for self-assessment.



Gene editing

Amy te Plate-Church, “Earning public trust in gene editing”. Journal of Animal Science, Vol. 97 Sup. 3 (2019) 57–58.

Abstract
Gene editing has tremendous potential to benefit society and food production. Yet, the social license to develop the technology to its full potential is dependent on public support and market acceptance. Traditionally it has been assumed that sound science and appropriate government oversight will result in social acceptance of innovation. What consumers want first and foremost, according to research from The Center for Food Integrity (CFI), is to know that food producers share their values, like producing safe, affordable, nutritious food in a manner that protects our environment. Sixty-five percent of U.S. consumers surveyed want to know more about how food is produced (CFI, 2017). Testing of videos about CRISPR indicate more than half of viewers want to learn more, and support for CRISPR rose from 45 to 60% when given credible, clear and understandable information. In reviewing more than 15 studies about consumer opinions on biotechnology, CFI found these consistent themes. 1) There is a considerable knowledge gap among consumers – in science and modern plant and animal breeding. 2) Before describing gene editing, it is helpful to show the evolution of genetic improvement. 3) The public wants information from credentialed experts, but they do not want an academic explanation. 4) Analogies and visuals are important to explain science, and they should be understandable without being oversimplified. 5) Consumers show strongest support for benefits of science related to environmental stewardship, healthier food and disease resistance. 6) Consumers have additional questions about use of science in animals, compared to plants. Because scientists and academic institutions among the most-trusted sources for information about biotechnology, they have a unique opportunity to effectively engage and provide information the public wants and needs to make informed decisions about gene editing.



Halal products

Maya F. Farah, “Consumer perception of Halal products: An empirical assessment among Sunni versus Shiite Muslim consumers”. Journal of Islamic Marketing (2020) doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2019-0191 [published online before print: 26 February 2020[5]].

Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the effects of religiosity level, ethnocentrism, subjective norms, product judgment and trust in Halal food products on the consumer intention to purchase a Muslim (manufactured in a majority Muslim country) versus a foreign (manufactured in a majority non-Muslim country) product available on the Lebanese market across the two main Muslim sects, namely, Sunnism and Shiism.
Design/methodology/approach - The study used a quantitative survey that was administered to a proportionate stratified sample of 607 respondents from the two sects.
Findings - The results indicate that Sunni consumers indicate a greater trust in judgment of and willingness to buy foreign Halal products compared to their Shiite counterparts, while Shiite consumers display a greater trust in judgment of and willingness to buy Muslim products. Moreover, religiosity, ethnocentrism, subjective norms, brand trust and product judgment have been found to significantly influence consumer purchase intention.
Practical implications - The study results exhibit that religious sect plays a key role in consumer purchase intention, which encourages decision makers and marketers to pursue identity, awareness and communication strategies while targeting Muslim consumers of both sects.
Originality/value - Muslim consumers’ perception of Halal products is a sorely under-researched area of study with minimal empirical data supporting such studies. The results of this study offer some insight into consumer behavior differences between members of the two sects.



Manufacturing transparency

Xinyu Chen and Tobias Voigt, “Implementation of the Manufacturing Execution System in the Food and Beverage Industry”. Journal of Food Engineering (2020) doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.109932 [published online before print: 25 January 2020[6]].

Abstract
The Manufacturing Execution System (MES) is a production management system serving as the information center in the enterprise to improve manufacturing transparency. It is the middle layer connecting the manufacturing process on the shop floor and the business process on the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) level. On the one hand, the MES guides the execution of rough production plans into detailed operations on the shop floor. On the other hand, it provides the firm with critical key performance indicators (KPIs), enabling commercial decisions. The support from the MES, such as production fine planning, performance analysis, and product tracing, can help manufacturers to be efficient and gain more competitiveness in the global market. However, in the food and beverage industry, which faces strict regulations, growing competitiveness, customer demand changing, and suffer from low-profit margins, the implementation of the MES did not become widespread. This article intends to present the particular characteristics of the food and beverage manufacturing process, analyze the potential benefits and barriers of the MES implementation in the food and beverage industry through literature review. The solutions to solve the MES implementation issues and the research areas that need to be explored in order to meet the MES requirements from the food and beverage industry are also discussed in this article.



Meat and meat products

GrahamLawton, “The food revolution starts here”. New Scientist , Vol. 245 No. 3270 (2020) 39-43 [published online before print: 21 February 2020[7]].



Slovenia

Patricia Blatnik and Štefan Bojnec, “Food Quality Schemes: The Case of Slovenia”. Quality - Access to Success, Vol. 21 No. 175 (2020) 131-135.

Abstract
The paper investigates the adoption and diffusion of the European Union food quality schemes focusing on organic food, protected designation of origin, protected geographical indication, and traditional speciality guaranteed products. The country specific focus of results and findings on food quality schemes is on Slovenia, which has potential to increase importance of these possible premium price segment markets with expected higher demands for food quality and safety for health of consumers and benefits to the environment in comparison to conventional food products. The importance of food quality of locally produced products is promoted in activities carried out through several national projects regarding local origin, Slovenian food and countryside with designation of higher food quality. Food quality schemes and protected food products are identified to have economic impacts on supply and demand side of food markets with potential for the producer organizations involved in value chains and the protection of higher quality of locally produced food.



Traceability

Jianping Qian et al., “Food traceability system from governmental, corporate, and consumer perspectives in the European Union and China: A comparative review”. Trends in Food Science & Technology, Vol. 99 (2020) 402-412.

Abstract
Background - Food safety has garnered much worldwide attention recently for reasons that are, unfortunately, not always positive. Traceability system (TS) is designed to assure safe and good quality food, while reducing the costs of food recalls. It should encompass all stakeholders, including governments, companies, and consumers, each of whom has an important role in the implementation and guardianship of such systems. The EU and China are amongst the main players implementing TS and are constantly exploring new opportunities and monitoring challenges for TS in a time of shifting consumer demands and rapid new technology innovation.
Scope and approach - This article states development stages from TS 1.0 to 3.0. and reviews TS development in a number of key countries and regions. Comparisons between the EU and China are drawn in terms of government, corporate, and consumer involvement in traceability.
Key findings and conclusions - A functional TS, while providing bi-directional communication between trading partners, must meet the laws and regulations where it operates. A functional system must also consider consumer value and perception, which varies with geography. There are a variety of promising technologies available on the market today to modernize TS, including artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain. A key finding of this research is that both the EU and China have developed significant trade links in recent years which will certainly positively impact both economies. Key to underpinning the sustainability of these trade links will be the adoption of common TS to prevent negative associations.





© Luis Gonzalez Vaque 2020

22/10/2019

BARCELONA 6/11/2019 - Cap on va la legislació alimentària de la UE: Simplificació o Complexificació



Barcelona, 6/11/2019 - Taula de Debat sobre Polítiques Alimentàries: Cap on va la legislació alimentària de la UE: Simplificació o Complexificació?

6 de novembre 2019 (dimecres) - Horari: 18:0h- 20:30 h
Lloc: Sala d’Actes del Col.legi d’Economistes de Catalunya. Pça Gal.la Placídia

Organitza
Comissió d’Economia Agroalimentària del Col.legi d’Economistes de Catalunya i el Grup Barcelona de Dret Alimentari (Grup BDA), del Col·legi de l’Advocacia de Barcelona, amb la col.laboració de l’Associació Catalana de Ciències de l’Alimentació.


Presentació
Hem reunit a tres grans experts per parlar sobre les Polítiques Agrària i de Sanitat de la UE. Els ponents són coneixedors des d’una excel·lent visió i comprensió d’aquests temes. Ells ens ofereixen els punts de vista de qui ha estat dissenyador de politiques europees en aquest àmbit, de qui les ha hagut de concretar en la seva activitat professional i de qui n’és estudiós des de la universitat. Al llarg del debat ens preguntarem si les actuals politiques  simplifiquen o complexifiquen la resolució dels problemes a abordar, si s’adeqüen o no a les necessitats alimentàries de la població europea i si els ciutadans estem satisfets d’aquestes Polítiques. També com aquestes polítiques poden ajudar a evitar casos de frau alimentari o de propagació de malalties derivades del consum de productes contaminants, com ha estat la recent de la carn entotxada de Catalunya
Moderador:
  • Sr. Francesc Reguant.
President de la Comissió d’Economia Agroalimentària del CEC
Ponents:
  • Sr. Luis Gonzalez-Vaqué.
Ex Conseller de la DG MARKT, Comissió Europea.
  • Sr. José Juan Rodríguez Jerez.
Profesor de la Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, i Director del Grup de Recerca d’Anàlisi Microbiològic de Superfícies i Avaluació de Microfilms
  • Sr. Eduard Arruga.

Ex directiu de Nestlé i ex President del Banc dels Aliments
https://obealimentaria.wordpress.com/2019/10/08/taula-de-debat-sobre-dret-alimentari-cap-on-va-la-legislacio-alimentaria-de-la-ue-simplificacio-o-complexificacio/


PER A INSCRIPCIONS CAL PREMER EL SEGÜENT ENLLAÇ: