15/11/2014

Question for written answer E-004785/14 to the Commission - Gilles Pargneaux: Labelling not in line with provisions on genetically modified organisms (GMO)

 
 
 
Question for written answer E-004785/14 to the Commission - Gilles Pargneaux (S&D)(15 April 2014)
.
Subject: Labelling not in line with provisions on genetically modified organisms (GMO)
.
In a report on its 2012 animal feed inspection programme, France's Competition, Consumer Protection and Anti-Fraud Directorate-General reveals that, in recent years, close to 10% of animal feed has not been labelled in line with GMO provisions.
.
Is the Commission aware of that report?
.
If so, what does it intend to do to combat such fraudulent practices?
.
.
Answer given by Mr Borg on behalf of the Commission (17 June 2014)
.
The EU legislation, and particularly Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003(1) on genetically modified food and feed, foresees compulsory labelling requirements for those food and feed products which contain, consist or are produced from GMOs which have been authorised in accordance with the relevant procedure established by the regulation, with the exception of a presence below 0,9% and technically unavoidable.
.
The control and enforcement of EU labelling requirements is the responsibility of Member States, as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 on food and feed controls(2)
.
Following the question raised by the Honourable Member as regards the report issued by France's Competition, Consumer Protection and Anti-Fraud Directorate-General on its 2012 inspection programme on GMO labelling on animal feed, the Commission services have asked the French authorities to supply a copy of this report. It appears from this report that non-compliances with labelling requirement are not necessarily intentional and thus be assimilated to fraudulent practices. National administrative or jurisdictional actions, as the case may be, are engaged in the case of repeated incompliance or of refusal by the operator to proceed to the improvements required.
(1)OJ L 268, 18.10.2003.
(2)OJ L 191, 28.5.2004.
 
 
 


 
 
 
(